[Radical Action Cooperative ; Council for Liberation of Imagination]. [Samizdat on the 1968-9 Harvard protests]. Cambridge, MA: n.p., ca. 1968-69. n.p. [14 p.]; 21 x 29 cm.; black ink on xeroxed white stock.
Samizdat of hastily photocopied texts by the the Radical Action Cooperative (King Collins et al.) / Council for Conscious Existence / Council for Liberation of Daily Life, with an early 70s provenance. Almost all of the texts are unaccounted for (only one is included in Ken Knabb’s archive at Yale), but all relate to the brief, chaotic intervention at Harvard University in the spring of 1969
New York-based Radical Action Cooperative (RAC), which had originally formed on the margins of the Spring 1968 Columbia University strikes, migrated north to Cambridge the following year. While the mainstream American section of the Situationist International famously dismissed King Collins’ cohort as “ideologists of daily life” who staged “unimaginative confrontations,” these texts reveal a highly articulated, totalizing critique of the university system as an extension of the capitalist “spectacle.”
The centerpiece of this samizdat is the multi-page manifesto, A Response to Questions About Classroom Disruption, dated March 14, 1968 (evidently a typographical error for 1969, given the specific chronology of the events described). The document was rushed to standard duplicating machines immediately following the group’s highly controversial infiltration of Professor Alex Inkeles’ elite sociology course, Social Relations 153. Addressing the fierce student backlash to their intervention, the text rejects the liberal defense of Inkeles as a “good professor,” utilizing a classic anti-pedagogical position: “We do not aim to criticize any authority as an individual… within our society, the University serves as an Officers’ Candidate School, socializing tomorrow’s leaders… The ‘good teacher’ and ‘nice fellow’ is most dangerous. These authorities are doing violence to you and to themselves by creating a false consciousness.”. Responding to accusations on page 3 that their disruptions violated basic “norms of etiquette and politeness,” the text highlights the radical dissonance between classroom decorum and global violence: You say ‘It’s rude’ to interrupt your class but you probably don’t bat an eye to hear that 2000 Vietnamese have been killed and 5000 Biafrans have starved this week. How are you protesting these ‘insults’ to humanity?”. The manifesto relies heavily on detourned cultural markers to build its anti-authoritarian stance. It closes with a hand-typed excerpt from Bob Dylan’s It’s Alright, Ma (I’m Only Bleeding) (“For them that obey authority / that they do not respect in any degree…”), positioned directly above their foundational aphorism: “Classrooms confine students. They can’t hold a free man.”
The companion flyer, [Why Do Soc. Rel. 153 Students Support the Cops?], acts as a theoretical post-mortem to the inevitable police intervention that followed. It targets the passivity of the student spectators, asserting that by willingly participating in the conventions of grading, examinations, and “professorial authority,” students become complicit in their own domestication. The arc of this short-lived experiment is starkly documented by the accompanying judicial tracking sheet, Bitter Fruit of the University: Pettiness That Plays So Rough. It registers the severe criminal sentences handed down by the Cambridge authorities to suppress the group’s performance-style disruptions: King Collins received two years in the House of Correction; Peter Waring was sentenced to one year; Peter O’Grady and Ed Hyman both received six months; while Sue Crane was penalized with a $220 fine.
To bridge this theoretical critique with the visual assault that covered the Cambridge campus, the Council relied heavily on détournement—the classic Situationist tactic of hijacking commercial comic strips and infusing them with radical philosophy. In a striking piece credited to the Council for Liberation of Imagination (titled “[I have been a PL member for a month now…]”), the group parodied clean-cut romance comics to satirize Marxist-Leninist student groups like the Progressive Labor Party (PL) and SDS. The comic skewers dogmatic students who trade the “boredom” of sociology for bureaucratic militancy, concluding that Capitalist society simply “learned from Eastern bureaucracies how to organize the illusion of participation.”
This artistic warfare was expanded across several others leaflets / broadsides that outlined the physical mechanics of campus revolt:
- Proletariat as Subject and Representation: Echoing the exact chapter titles of Guy Debord’s The Society of the Spectacle, this densely illustrated comic strip calls for a “proletarian revolution [that] depends integrally upon this crucial synthesis” of theory and practice. It fiercely denounces orthodox leftists as “pseudo-revolutionaries” whose predictable rumblings are merely the beats to which corporate-bureaucratic managers in “Peking-Harvard-Bonn-Moscow-Washington-Tel-Aviv and Tokyo” will dance.
- Initiation Rites for Professors and Administrators: Credited to les enragés of Harvard (with layout adapted from Detroit’s Black Red), this analytical poster provides a taxonomy of tactical subversion. It charts a progression from “Confrontation” (where the student rejects the grade as a limitation on action) to “Revolutionary Action,” declaring that when students cease to be passive observers, “THE SPECTACLE IS SHATTERED.” The text explicitly argues that the campus struggle cannot be isolated from daily life, as the capitalist system “colonizes every aspect of daily life.”
- The New Radical Middle Caucus of the Enraged of Harvard: This narrative comic strips away the authority of university officials by depicting panicking deans operating a conveyor belt of “submissive students.” When faced with disruptions, the comic’s caricatured administrators exclaim, “The solution is to stifle and destroy their demands by super-imposing our own issues!” before a final, chaotic frame showing a dean weeping, “I’m sorry! I’ll give it all up! I’ll join your strike!” below a triumphant call to reader-activists to “SMASH ALL ADMINISTRATIONS!”
Exceedingly scarce. No individual institutional listings for these specific Harvard titles are recorded in OCLC, though scattered remnants of the Council’s broader output occasionally surface within the radical pamphlet collections of the Tamiment Library or the Labadie Collection. Not in Knabb’s archive at Yale’s Beinecke Library.

































































